Triamacinolone Acetonide Versus Bevacizumab in Treatment of Neovascular Age Related Macular Degeneration-Juniper Publishers
Purpose: To evaluate the effects of
intravitreal triamacinolone acetonide (IVTA) and bevacizumab injection
on visual acuity, electro physiologic response and foveal thickness of
patients with neo vascular age related macular degeneration (CNVs).
Methods: The study included three groups.
Group 1 included fifty eyes (50 patients) with progressive occult or
predominately occult sub foveal choroidal neovascularization treated
with intravitreal injection of trimacinolone acetonide. Group 2 included
another fifty eyes (50 patients) with progressive macular degeneration
of occult or predominately occult sub foveal choroidal
neovascularization treated with intravitreal bevacizumab. The patients
is followed up every month by bio microscopy, optical coherence
tomography (OCT), photography, fluoresce in angiography, Ganzfeld full
field electro retinogram(F-ERG), multifocal electro retinogram (MF-ERG)
and determination of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Group 3
(control group) included 50eyes (50 patients) with neo vascular age
related macular degeneration who did not receive treatment for macular
degeneration.
Results: Apparent improvement of morphological
and functional characteristics were observed in 40/50 eyes after one
month after first injection in group1, and in 45/50 in group 2. The
mean±SD visual acuity improved significantly (p=0.003) from (0.12 ±0.19
to 0.35±0.25) in group1 and from 0.13±0.2 to 0.40±0.28 in group 2.
Visual acuity was highest 1-2 month after intravitreal injection.
Central macular thickness decreased from 325±50^m to 275±40^m at one
month after first injection in group 1 and decreased from 320±53^m to
255±41^m in group 2 while in control group, there is statistically
insignificant increase of the central thickness. The average amplitude
of central macular ring of MFERG was improved from 25.5±5.8nv to
31±8.9nv in group 1 and from 26.6±6.1nv to 33±9.9nv in group 2, while no
changes in F-ERG response. Intraocular pressure increased significantly
(p=0.009) from 14±2.5mmHg to maximal 23±7.6mmHg in group 1. Intraocular
pressure decreased significantly (p=0.006) to 16±2mmHg at the end of
follow up while in group 2, there was no increase in intraocular
pressure. No other serious drug related adverse events (endophthalmitis,
retinal detachment, cataract or proliferative vitreo retinopathy)
observed during the course of the study in groups 1, 2. In control
group, visual acuity, central foveal thickness and function did not
change significantly during follow up period (p=0.6, p=0.4, p=0.1
respectively).
Conclusion: Intravitreal injection of
trimacinolone acetonide may transiently stabilize or improve visual
acuity in some patients with progressive neo vascular age related
macular degeneration. Intravitreal injection of bevacizumab led to a
more visual improvement than IVTA in treatment CNVs. MFERG had an
important role in describing the effect of treatment on retinal
function. Intravitreal injection improved MFERG macular function
responses with little insignificant change in F-ERG.
Keywords: Electroretinogram; Optical coherence tomography; Choroid neovascularization; Avastin; Triamacinolone acetate
None of the present treatment decreases the loss of
vision on the central 35° of the retina in macular degeneration.
Neovascular age related macular degeneration is a common reason for
irreversible reduction and loss of vision in the world [1] . Triamacinolone acetonide is one of the first drugs used for the management of age related choroidal neo vascularization [2]
. Triamacinolone acetonide stabilizes blood retinal barrier, decreases
the permeability and inflammation, increases the diffusion and reduces
vascular endothelial growth factor [3]. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays important role in AMD pathogenesis [4].
Bevacizumab is humanized antibody to human vascular endothelium growth
factor (VEGF) which combines to VEGF and hinders it from attachment to
its receptors [5].
Electro retinogram of neo vascular macular degeneration gives
information about the treatment safety. MF-ERG represents the photopic
retinal response to a rapidly changing stimulus on the central 35° of
the retina [6]. Neovascular age related macular degeneration decreases the central peak amplitude which is altered by subretinal fluid [7].
MF-ERG is used to monitor the localized change after treatment. Full
field ERG response reflects general retinal electrical response and
gives information about treatment toxicity [6,7].
The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the effects of
triamacinolone acetonide and bevacizumab on visual acuity and retinal
thickness in neovascular age related macular degeneration patients and
to study the effects of triamacinolone acetonide and bevacizumab on the
retinal function.
This study was carried out on patients attending the
Outpatient's Clinic of Mansoura Ophthalmic Center during the period from
February 2012 to December 2015. One hundred and fifty patients (150)
with neovascular age related macular degeneration were included in the
study.
The patients were divided into three group:
a) Group 1: Included progressive occult subfoveal
choroidal neovascularization patients who received intravitreal
injection of triamcinolone acetonide.
b) Group 2: Included occult subfoveal choroidal neovascularization patients who received intravitreal injection of bevacizumab.
c) Group 3 (control group): Included neovascular age related macular degeneration patients who refused intravitreal injection.
Included patients with classic type of neovascular
age related macular degeneration and any other ophthalmological. All
patients were examined on the first day after injection, in first week,
then every month for 6 months. A repeated injection was performed if
there were activity of choroidal neovascularization (CNV). Intra-retinal
and sub-retinal fluid accumulation, new intra-retinal and sub-retinal
hemorrhage and CNVs growth were signs of CNVs activity. Re-treatment was
done if there were signs of CNV activity or decreasing visual acuity.
At baseline of the study and at monthly intervals, all patients
underwent a routine ophthalmological examination. Goldman applanation
tonometry, direct and indirect ophthalmology, optical coherence
tomography (OCT), and electroretinogram (ERG) were done. Fluorescein
angiography was done using Topcon Corporation 2000, TRC, 50Ix, Japan.
Fluorescein angiography was performed for all patients at beginning and
after 3months and 6 months.
OCT was done with Topcon, 3 dimensional OCT-1000
(Topcon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). Internal fixation was chosen because
of better reproducibility. It scanned a cube of 6x6mm length. Central
macular thickness of a circular 1-mm radius area around the fovea was
calculated.
Full field ERG and MF-ERG were recorded using Roland Consult, (Germany system). ERG was done according to ISCEV standard [8].
After topical corneal anesthesia (Benoxinate hydrochloride 4%),
positive electrode (Dawson, Trick and litzkow (DTL) electrode) was
placed just contact with corneal limbus, ground electrode was installed
on the forehead and negative electrode was placed near orbital rim
temporary. The recording was monocular.
The test was started and recorded in 5 steps,
scotopic rod response, scotopic combined response, oscillatory potential
then light adaptation for 10 minute then photopic cone response and
flicker response recording.
Patients were positioned 30cm from the stimulus
monitor. Stimulus clarity was adjusted by over-refraction. Each hexagon
was temporally modulated between light and dark according to binary
m-squence [9,10].
Patients fixated a spot in the center of the stimulus. The results of
two 8-minute recordings were averaged to improve the signal to noise
ratio.
In group 1, 25mg of crystalline triamacinolone
acetonide (Volona A, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Munich, Germany, containing
40mg of triamacinolone acetonide in 1ml) was injected intravitreal. The
injection of 25mg of crystalline triamacinolone acetonide was performed
using sharp 27-gauge needle in inferio-temporal quadrant 3.5mm from
limbus.Then antibiotic ointment was applied.
All patients in group 2 received Intravitreal
injection of 1.25mg/0.05 of bevacizumab. A total of 0.05ml Bevacizumab
was injected into vitrous cavity 3.5mm from limbus in inferotemporal
quadrant using 30 gauge needles. Postoperative antibiotics were used and
a light patch was placed. The eye patch is removed the next day.
Statistical analysis was performed using soft ware
(SPSS WIN Version11.5, SPSS Inc, Chicago). Non parametric Wilcoxon test
was applied for comparison. Spearman rank test and linear correlation
analysis were used in order to evaluate the correlation with changes of
MFERG, changes of OCT and best correct visual acuity. Significance was
set at p=0.05 (2-tailed) for all statistical tests.
The study included one hundred and fifty (150)
patients (one hundred and fifty eyes). The patients were divided into
three groups. Group 1 included fifty eyes (50) of fifty patients (50)
with progressive occult or predominately occult subfoveal choroidal
neovascularization who received one or more than one of intravitreal
injection of 25mg of triamcinolone acetonide, Mean age was 60±8.6years
,ranged (55 -75 years old). Group 2 included another fifty eyes (50) of
fifty patients with progressive occult or predominately occult sub
foveal choroidal neovascularization) who received one or more than one
of intravitreal injection of 1.25mg/0.05ml of bevacizumab. The Mean age
was 62±6.9 years, ranged (58-74 years). Group 3 (Control group) included
fifty eyes (50) of fifty patients (50) (with neovascular age related
macular but did not receive intravitreal injection of tri amcinolone
acetonide for this disease after explanation the importance of treatment
for visual acuity and CNVs. The Mean age was 61 ±7.9 years, ranged
(58-74 years). There was no significant difference between groups. In
group 1, Ten (10) patients received a second intravitreal injection of
25mg of triamcinolone acetonide. According to flourescein angiography,
group 1 were further divided into subgroups with occult or mostly
(>50%) occult without hemorrhage (n=40, 80%), subgroup with
sub-retinal hemorrhage (n=7, 14%) and subgroups with retinal pigment
detachment (n=4, 8%). While in group 2, occult CNV without haemorrhage
was presented in 35 eyes (70%), with haemorrhage was present in 10 eyes
(20%) and retinal pigment detachment was found in 5 eyes (10%) ( Table1).
All three subgroups did not vary significantly (p=0.2) at baseline. In
control group, all subjects were having occult CNV without sub retinal
hemorrhage.
All patients complained of decreased visions which
were diagnosed by ophthalmologic examination within three months before
IVTA. The mean VA at baseline in group 1, group 2 and control Group
(0.12±0.19, 0.13±0.05 and 0.14±0.22) respectively. (Range from finger
counting to 0.3 in group 1, from finger count to 0. 32 in group 2 and
from finger counting to 0.5 in control group. For the Group 1 and Group
2, mean VA increased significantly (p=0.003) after first injection to
maximum 0.35±0.25 during the follow up period (Table 2).
The maximum postoperative VA was detected 1-2 months after the
injection. The increase in VA was statistically significant in 1st month
(p=0.003) and 2nd month (p=0.004) after the injection. The preoperative
visual acuity and postoperative visual acuity achieved at the end of
the follow up period did not differ significantly (p=0.2) in group 1
while in group 2, there is statistically significant difference between
VA at the baseline and VA at the end. In group 1, Visual acuity
significantly decreased towards the end of the follow up period,
parallel to a disappearance of triamacinolone acetate crystals out of
vitreous cavity. In group 1, after 1 month, 40eyes (80%) gained in
visual acuity and 4eyes (8%) lost visual acuity. Visual acuity was
unchanged for 6 eyes (12%). While, in group 2, 45 eyes (90%) gained in
visual acuity. There were no significant correlation between
postoperative visual acuity and postoperative change in visual acuity
(p=0.6). For three subgroups, there were significant difference in gain
in visual acuity (p=0.04). Ten eyes received second injection three
months after first injection, visual acuity increased in eight eyes
about one month after the re-injection and declined again after about 3
month in group 1 while in group 2, fifteen eyes received second
injection after 2 months, and fourteen eyes of fifteen improved after
reinjection.
For group 1, Central subfield OCT thickness was
325±50μm at baseline. The central subfield OCT thickness decreased to
280±55μm at one week and 275± 40μm at one month (Table 3, Figure 1).
In group 2, central subfield OCT thickness was 320±53μm at baseline.
The Central subfield OCT thickness decreased to 270± 40μm at one week
and 255±41μm at one month
F-ERG data is presented in (Table 4).
No significant worsening of FERG response was observed during follow up
period in the three groups. Most of the values were within the limits
normal variation. For most subjects retested one month with F-ERG, the
amplitude returned to baseline after a slight decrease in scotopic and
photopic amplitudes at one week. For all subjects who was received
either triamacinolone acetate or bevacizumab had an essentially stable
F-ERG.
In most cases, there was improvement at one week, one month and two months of IVTA, then return to baseline value at 3 months (Table 5, Figure 2 & 3). In group 2, there was increase in amplitude and decrease in latency reach the maximum after 2 months.
In group 1, IOP increased significantly (p=0.005)
from 14.5±2.5mmHg at baseline of the study to a mean maximal value of
20±5.6mmHg again decreased significantly to 16.5mm Hg at 6 months after
IVTA at p=0.001. IOP measurements at the end were slightly and
significantly (P=0.05) higher. During the study, IOP was higher than
22mmHg in 30 eyes (60%). In those patients, IOP normalized by topical
anti-glaucomatous drugs. Optic nerve damage was not detected. While in
group 2, there was no case with increase in intraocular pressure. With
respect to other complication of IVTA, three cases of cataract were
detected in group 1, while no case of cataract was observed in group 2.
No postoperative infectious endophthalimitis, rhegmatogenous retinal
detachment or proliferative vitreo-retinopathy was detected in groups 1
and group 2.
While, classic type of subfoveal neovascularization,
photodynamic therapy with verteporfin stabilizes or increases visual
acuity. Photodynamic therapy for occult subfoveal neovascularization is
unsuccessful [11,12].
Steroids have antiinflammatory, antiangiogenic, antifibrotic and
antipermeability properties, which contribute to stabilization of the
blood- retina barrier [13] Penfold et al. [14,15] Chella et al. [16], injected trimacinolone intraviteal to treat exudative macular degeneration. Additionally, Danis et al. [17], detected a beneficial effect of trimacinolone in the study group compared with control group. Also, Ranson et al. [18], treated recurrent subfoveal neovascularization after laser treatment by IVTA. Chella et al. [16]
evaluated the efficacy of intravitreal of trimacinolone for one and
half year in exudative age related macular degeneration. They reported
that a single intravitreal injection of 4mg of trimacinoloneacetate was
helpful in treatment of exudative age related macular degeneration. In
this study (in group 1), there was increase in visual acuity, reduction
of fluorescein angiography leakage, reduction central macular thickness
and increase in amplitude of MFERG with reduction of implicit time in 40
eyes of 50eyes (80%) within 2 months. Ten eyes of 40 eyes (25%) receive
another intravitreal injection after 3 months (after beginning of
reduction of visual acuity with increase macular thickness, reduction of
amplitude of MFERG and increase implicit time). There was improvement
of six of ten eyes (60%).
There was correlation between visual acuity and
central macular thickness (p=0.008, R=0.5) and visual acuity and MFERG
amplitude (P=0.006, R=0.55). Also, there was significant correlation
between central macular thickness and MFERG amplitude (P=0.001, R=0.65)
in group 1. In this study, we injected high dose of triamcinolone
acetate intravitreal in group 1, because the results of previous studies
were not clear; Jonas et al found significant increase in visual acuity
after intravitreal injection of 25mg of trimacinolone acetate [19,20]. while Gillies et al. [21],
reported no effect of 4mg of intravitreal injection of trimacinolone
acetate on the development of sever visual loss during one year follow
up. The Causes for the difference between studies may be the amount of
injected trimacinolone acetate Second cause for difference between
studies may be related to the effect of development of cataract on
vision. Other cause for discrepancy between this study and investigation
of Gillies et al. [21]
may be that their study included classic subfoveal neovascularization
that had a worse prognosis than occult choroidal neovascularization.
There was significant elevation in intraocular
pressure in group 1 compared with other groups. There was 30 eyes (60%)
had increased intraocular pressure. All cases were controlled with
medical anti-glaucomatous treatment. Various studies have reported
increase of IOP ranging from11-30% of subjects following IVTA [17,19,22]
None of patients had been shown infectious endophthalmitis,
rhgmatogenous retinal detachment , or proliferative vitreo retinopathy
in this study .
Jonas et al. [19]
found the reduction of visual acuity started 4-5 months after initial
increase in visual acuity two months after injection. Similarly, in the
present study after initial increase of vision two month after
injection, visual performance started to decrease again. This may be
result from resolving of trimacinolone acetate crystals Vascular
endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays an important role in the
pathogenesis of AMD 22 Intravitreal bevacizumab injection was reported
to be effective for treatment exudative AMD. Bevacizumab inhibit VEGF,
decrease angiogenesis and decrease vascular permeability. [23-25].
In group 2, there were increase in visual acuity,
reduction in retinal thickness and improvement of electrophysiological
amplitudes and latencies. The improvement was slightly more significant
in group 2 than in group 1 (As seen in Table 1)
The cause for this improvement in group 2 more than group 2 is that
triamcinolone exerted its antiangiogenic effect by enhancing endostatin
expression rather than suppressing VEGF expression [26]. While bevacizumab decrease angiogenesis by decreasing VEGF expression and enhancing endostatin [27].
There was correlation between visual acuity and central macular
thickness (p=0.006, R=0.55) and visual acuity and MFERG amplitude
(P=0.005, R=0.65). Also, there was significant correlation between
central macular thickness and MFERG amplitude (P=0.003, R=0.6) in group
2. Similarly, Rosenfeld et al reported that intravitreal injection of
bevacizumab cause marked decrease in retinal thickness without toxicity [28]. Ahmadieh et al. observed improvement of vision and reduction of thickness after bevacizumab [29]. Also, Falkenstein et al showed that primary bevacizumab therapy resulted in significantly visual improvement [30]. The bevacizumab preparation is unpreserved and contains no ingredients that are toxic to the eye [28].
Intravitreal bevacizumab is well tolerated in the majority of patients.
In this study, there were no complications in group 2. Only
subconjuctival heamorrhage in two cases which resolved within a week.
While, Ahmadieh et al. [29]. Observed one case with pigment epithelial detachment without any cases of endophalmitis or sub-conjuctival haemorrhage [29]. Also, Cleary et al. [30].
Found endophthalmitis in 1 of 112 eyes, submacular hemorrhage in 3 of
112 eyes and retinal pigment epithelial tears in 3 of112 eyes. Ronan et
al. [31],
and Avery said that the presence of pigment epithelial detachment was
risk factor for retinal pigment epithelial tear after IVB injection [32].
The limitations of this study were the method of measuring visual
acuity. Instead of the charts used for the Early Treatment Diabetic
Retinopathy [33],
visual acuity was determined using Snellen charts. But, the same method
was used to three groups. Other limitation of this study was limited
follow up and limited number of the patients, the relatively high dose
of trimacinolone acetate injected into eye. In summary, intravitreal
injection of trimacinolone acetate and bevacizumab improve visual acuity
transiently in patients with neovascular age related macular
degeneration. Furthermore, intravitreal injection caused anatomical
changes and functional improvement of MFERG. Bevacizumab gave more
favorable visual outcome and anatomical and functional improvement than
triamcinolone acetate. To stabilize visual acuity, repeated intravitreal
injection is recommended with 2-3 months apart with take care of
complication especially intraocular pressure in cases of IVTA.
For more Open Access
Journals in Juniper Publishers please
click on: https://juniperpublishers.com
For more articles in Journal
of Physical Fitness, Medicine & Treatment in Sports
please click on: https://juniperpublishers.com/jpfmts/index.php
For more about juniper publishers please click on:
https://www.juniperpublishersgroup.com/