Preemptive Inferior Fornixstabilizing Procedure to Reduce Chemosis During Lower Eyelid Ectropion Repair: Surgical Technique and Outcomes- Juniper Publishers

Juniper Publishers- JOJ Ophthalmology

Results

A total of 19 patients underwent the inferior fornix suture stabilization procedure at the time of ectropion repair surgery. The average age was 82.5 years old (Range: 63-95), 13 were male (68.4%) and 6 were female (31.6%). Of the 19 patients included in the study, a total of 24 eyes underwent the inferior fornix stabilization procedure (5 OD, 9 OS, 5OU). The average number of postoperative follow-up visits was 2.2 (Range: 1-4), and the average total follow-up length was 8.5 weeks (Range: 1-16). In 79.2 percent (19 of 24) of the cases, no postoperative chemosis was noted following the ectropion repair in combination with the inferior fornix stabilization procedure described above. The incidence of chemosis noted postoperatively was 20.8 percent (5 of 24). The following chemosis classification system described by Weinfeld et al. [4] was used for classifying postoperative chemosis:

1. Type 1 (acute mild) involves mild edema and inflammation, yellow and/or pink conjunctiva color, absent lagophthalmos, and less than three weeks duration.
2. Type 2 (acute severe) involves severe edema and inflammation, yellow and/or pink conjunctiva color, lagophthalmos present laterally, and less than three weeks duration.
3. Type 3 (subchronic) involves mild to severe edema, chronic inflammation, pink color, absent lagophthalmos, and duration of chemosis between three weeks and six months.
4. Type 4 (subchronic because of lower lid malposition) involves severe edema, moderate to severe inflammation, pink color, lower lid malposition and/or ectropion, and duration lasting until lid malposition is corrected [4].

All five cases of postoperative chemosis were classified as Type 1, acute mild. In all cases, chemosis ultimately resolved without any permanent sequela. No secondary entropion was observed in any case. All patients maintained good function, motility, and cosmesis of lower eyelids, and physician and patient satisfaction was achieved in all cases.

Discussion

This surgical technique may be used for preventing postoperative chemosis, thus limiting the deleterious effects that conjunctival edema may have on wound healing. Indications for this chemosis limiting procedure may be for severe ectropion repair, patients with high likelihood of ectropion repair failure, or those at high risk for postoperative chemosis. Chemosis or severe lid instability on preoperative physical exam, as well as a history of previous chronic chemosis following ocular surgery may provide indication for inferior fornix stabilization at the time of the initial surgery. Additionally, this chemosis limiting procedure may be used for postoperative patients who have chronic chemosis resistant to medical management requiring a return to the operating room for surgical treatment of the conjunctival edema.

Sutures have been used for correcting eyelid malrotation for centuries [11]. Snellen described the Snellen Suture Technique in 1869 for correcting ectropion by passing a suture through the conjunctiva in the inferior fornix and out the skin inferiorly, therefore rotating the eyelid margin. Snellen used two horizontal mattress sutures about 3 mm apart just inferior to the tarsus, nearest the margin of the eyelid. The first was placed at the junction of the outer and middle third of the conjunctiva, and the second at the junction of the inner and middle third [1,12]. A modified Snellen suture technique was described by Laval and Schneider and later by Barrett aimed at correcting inferior prolapsed conjunctiva, differing from Snellen by incorporating the arcus marginalis and inferior orbital rim [13,14]. This incorporation, however, resulted in an increased risk of secondary entropion [10,13]. Malone and Tse described a inferior fornix suture technique for treating postoperative prolapsed conjunctiva using three double-armed 4-0 chromic gut sutures inserted in a horizontal mattress fashion to invaginate prolapsed inferior forniceal conjunctiva. The suture needle was passed through the dome of the prolapsed conjunctiva, into the inferior cul-de-sac, and brought out through the skin 8-9mm below the lash margin, and tied without a bolster. By not incorporating the arcus marginalis and inferior orbital rim, and by passing the suture full thickness through the eyelid, the likelihood of causing eyelid malrotation was likely reduced [10]. Unlike the technique described by Malone and Tse, the inferior fornix suture technique in this study was done at the time of the primary surgery in a preemptive effort aimed at prevention of postoperative chemosis and inferior fornix conjunctival prolapse in high risk patients. Additionally, foam bolsters were used when tying the sutures and the procedure did not include a temporary tarsorraphy.

This simple surgical procedure offers several advantages over medical management alone. It can be used as a corrective treatment for persistent chemosis, and also as a preventative measure for those with a high likelihood of postoperative chemosis. Also, preventing the inferior fornix conjunctiva from prolapsing or repositioning intra operative prolapsed conjunctiva will minimize exposure, inflammation, and epidermalization of the conjunctiva [10].

This study, however, has some limitations. The lack of control arm comparing chemosis incidence following severe ectropion repair without the proposed inferior fornix stabilization procedure restricts us from comparing the natural history of chemosis independent of the inferior fornix stabilization. Future studies of this technique could be performed prospectively. We do, however, feel that this technique significantly reduced the likelihood of postoperative chemosis given that only 20.8 percent of severe ectropion repairs in patients who were at high risk of postoperative chemosis actually manifested chemosis, all of which were characterized as Type 1, acute mild. Additionally, all cases of chemosis ultimately resolved without any permanent sequela. We believe this surgical technique can be used as a successful preventative measure for postoperative chemosis as well as for a surgical treatment option of postoperative chemosis resistant to conservative management.

Acknowledgment/Disclosure

The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.